I'm trying to do a conversion initialization of an std::tuple
(called w
) with elements from another std::tuple
(called t
) with same size but different element types.
In my application, the elements of w
must be constructed using a non-const reference
to the respective element of t
.
Unfortunately, there only exists a 4) converting copy-ctor
and a 5) converting move-ctor
for std::tuple
(reference). This means, the new element from w
can only be initialized using either a const reference
or rvalue reference
to the element of t
, and both are not applicable.
Example
First we have a element modifier class, that only binds to references of its element type.
template<typename T>
struct SingleElementModifier {
T& ref;
SingleElementModifier(T& ref) : ref(ref) { }
};
Next a type trait to get the type of w
given the type of t
. Essentially it wraps each element from t
into the SingleElementModifier
.
template<typename T> struct ModifierTuple;
template<typename... Ts>
struct ModifierTuple<std::tuple<Ts...>> {
using Type = std::tuple<SingleElementModifier<Ts>...>;
};
Now we have a TupleModifier
that takes a tuple t
and stores a tuple w
with modifiers to each element of the first tuple.
template<typename Tuple>
struct TupleModifier {
using TupleType = typename ModifierTuple<Tuple>::Type;
TupleType w;
TupleModifier(Tuple& t) : w{ t } { }
};
Now we only need to choose some tuple t
and create the modifer.
int main() {
/* just some example types, could be any type inside. */
std::tuple<double, std::pair<int, int>> t;
TupleModifier mod(t);
}
Here the compiler will stop and complain to me that no constructor for w{ t }
could be found, for the reason explained in the beginning.
Bad workaround
Theoretically, I could have SingleElementModifier
take a const T&
and use const_cast
to get rid of the const, but I was hoping for a better solution that doesn't require me to throw away const-correctness.
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire