Consider the below example :
#include <iostream>
#include <vector>
class S {
public:
S() { puts("S()"); }
S(int) { puts("S(int)"); }
~S() { puts("~S()"); }
S(const S &) { puts("S(const S&)"); }
S(S &&) { puts("S&&"); }
const S &operator=(const S &s) {
puts("=");
return s;
}
S &operator=(S &&s) {
puts("Move =");
return s;
}
};
int main() {
std::vector<S> s;
s.emplace_back();
s.emplace_back(6);
}
O/p :
S()
S(int)
S(const S&)
~S()
~S()
~S()
When only one element is emplaced_back
, the constructor/destructor pair
are called exactly once. But when there are multiple emplace_back
(like s.emplace_back(6);
), the copy constructor
is also called. Why is this behavior difference ? is there still a copy exists with emplace_back ?
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire