What is the different between C++11 non-type template parameter and C++17 non-type template parameters?

Consider this code:

using func = int (*)(int, int);

template<func F>
void  do_something(int first, int second) {}

int   something(int first, int second) {}

void  f()
{
  constexpr auto  function = something;
  do_something<function>(10, 20);
}

Which is compiled and run with C++17 standard compatible compiler, but it's fail with C++11 standard:

 error: no matching function for call to ‘do_something<function>(int, int)’
   17 |   do_something<function>(10, 20);

What it's the difference between C++11 non-type template parameters and C++17 non-type template parameters ? in §14.1.4 [temp.param][n3690]:

A non-type template-parameter shall have one of the following (optionally cv-qualified) types: — integral or enumeration type,
— pointer to object or pointer to function,
— lvalue reference to object or lvalue reference to function,
— pointer to member,
— std::nullptr_t.

And in §17.1.4 [temp.param][n4713]:

A non-type template-parameter shall have one of the following (optionally cv-qualified) types: (4.1) — integral or enumeration type,
(4.2) — pointer to object or pointer to function,
(4.3) — lvalue reference to object or lvalue reference to function,
(4.4) — pointer to member,
(4.5) — std::nullptr_t, or
(4.6) — a type that contains a placeholder type (10.1.7.4).

The only different is:

< — a type that contains a placeholder type (10.1.7.4).

Which i don't think it's related to my question because a placeholder type is something like auto, and i sent a value to template not a placeholder type or a type.