Using Boost adaptors with std::bind expressions

I have the following code:

#include <boost/range/adaptor/transformed.hpp>
#include <boost/range/algorithm.hpp>

#include <iostream>
#include <functional>
#include <memory>

struct A {
    A() = default;
    A(const A&) = delete;
    A& operator=(const A&) = delete;
};

struct B {
    B() = default;
    B(const B&) = delete;
    B& operator=(const B&) = delete;

    int foo(const A&, int b)  {
        return -b;
    }
};

int main() {
    A a;
    auto b = std::make_shared<B>();
    std::vector<int> values{1, 2, 3, 2};

    using std::placeholders::_1;
    auto fun = std::bind(&B::foo, b.get(), std::ref(a), _1);
    int min = *boost::min_element(values | boost::adaptors::transformed(fun));
    std::cout << min << std::endl;
}

When I try to compile it, clang gives the following error message (full output here):

/usr/local/include/boost/optional/optional.hpp:674:80: error: object of type 'std::_Bind<std::_Mem_fn<int (Base::*)(const A &, int)> (Base *, std::reference_wrapper<A>, std::_Placeholder<1>)>' cannot be assigned because its copy assignment operator is implicitly deleted

It seems that while the bind object has a copy constructor, its copy assignment operator is deleted. I get the same error if I try to use a lambda instead of bind.

1. Is this a bug in the C++11 standard, the libstdc++ implementation, or the Boost adaptor implementation?

2. What is the best workaround for this? I can wrap it into an std::function. It seems that boost::bind also works. Which is the more efficient, or does it really matter?