#include <iostream>
#include <string>
#include <thread>
using namespace std;
struct safe_thread : public thread
{
using thread::thread;
safe_thread& operator=(safe_thread&&) = default;
~safe_thread()
{
if (joinable())
{
join();
}
}
};
struct s
{
safe_thread t;
std::string text = "for whatever reason, this text will get corrupted";
s() noexcept
{
std::cout << text << '\n'; // it works in constructor as expected
t = safe_thread{ [this]
{ long_task(); }};
}
s(s&&) noexcept = default;
void long_task()
{
for (int i = 0; i < 500; ++i)
{
std::cout << text << '\n'; // the text gets corrupted in here
}
}
};
int main()
{
s s;
}
In the code above, the text
variable would print correctly in the constructor. However, in the long_task()
function running in a separate thread, the text gets corrupted (it outright crashes on another machine). How is that so? If the destructor of safe_thread
would be run in the destructor of struct s
, shouldn't the lifetime of thread
and text
last equally long? I.e they would both go out of scope when s goes out of scope at main()
?
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire