I have a template class that multiple classes are inheriting from to basically make some user-friendly builders, hiding the functions that are not required on different builders, while following DRY.
However, I'm having trouble switching between the builder types. I'd prefer to use the operator=
to switch without hassle and have the following code.
template<class T> class BuilderFunctions
{
protected:
std::string text;
public:
template<class Other>
BuilderFunctions<T>& operator=(const Other& other);
};
template <class T>
template <class Other>
BuilderFunctions<T>& BuilderFunctions<T>::operator=(const Other& other)
{
// yes, I need same object protection
text = other.text;
return *this;
}
Classes
class BuilderGenericList : public BuilderFunctions<BuilderGenericList>
{
public:
BuilderGenericList() = default;
};
// Build configuration details
class BuilderRootList : public BuilderFunctions<BuilderRootList>
{
private:
// I'll delete the functions I don't want accessed here
public:
BuilderRootList() = default;
};
Code that says no
// Real world you'd build the root first and switch out to another builder or be using a prototype to seed another builder
BuilderRootList cmakeRoot;
BuilderGenericList list;
// Separate to make sure it's not trying to use cop constructor
list = cmakeRoot;
Except I might be doing something I shouldn't be doing with template classes, although others seem to have success with templates in the operators, so assume possible, and I'm making some kind of mistake.
More info: The error I get is:
Error C2679 binary '=': no operator found which takes a right-hand operand
of type 'BuilderRootList' (or there is no acceptable conversion)
So It's definitely looking for my operator=
, it's just not generating one from the template
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire