Perfect forwarding constructor and deleted constructors

As pointed out by Michael Park, adding perfect forwarding constructors can be tricky if we do not want to end up in the wrong constructor.

Currently I have a class A which uses a perfect forwarding constructor, and because of that, I need to declare explicitly the 4 constructors: A&, const A&, A&& and const A&&:

class A
{
public:
    template<typename T> A(T&&);
    A(A&);
    A(const A&);
    A(A&&);
    A(const A&&);
};

I would like to forbid the usage of the const reference rvalue constructor, so I’m considering deleting it:

class A
{
public:
    template<typename T> A(T&&);
    A(A&);
    A(const A&);
    A(A&&);
    A(const A&&) = delete;
};

It looks like it works so far. But I’m just looking at a practical sample, I’d like a better confirmation, e.g. from the C++ standard.

Is it possible that the perfect forwarding constructor will take over the deleted constructor? After all, the universal reference T&& is compatible with const A&&.