I just read the following article from Raymond Chen's excellent 'The Old New Thing': https://devblogs.microsoft.com/oldnewthing/20210719-00/?p=105454
I have a question about this, best described in the following code snippet. Why is the initialization of 'x3' allowed at all? I don't see any semantic difference between the initialization of 'x2' and 'x3' below.
#include <memory>
class X
{
struct PrivateTag {}; // default constructor is *NOT* explicit
public:
X(PrivateTag) {}
static auto Create() -> std::unique_ptr<X>
{
return std::make_unique<X>(PrivateTag{});
}
};
int main()
{
auto x1 = X::Create(); // ok: proper way to create this
//auto x2 = X(X::PrivateTag{}); // error: cannot access private struct
auto x3 = X({}); // ok: why ?!
}
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire