I have two interfaces: IFace2
derives from IFace
class IFace
{
public:
virtual ~IFace() = default;
virtual void doit() = 0;
};
class IFace2 : public IFace
{
public:
virtual void doit2() = 0;
};
I am trying reduce code clutter that is required by the implementations. In IFace2Impl
I would like to use the same implementation from IFaceImpl
. Unfortunately, that forces me to resolve ambiguity and I need to override every function in IFace2Impl
:
class IFaceImpl : public IFace
{
public:
void doit() override
{
}
};
class IFace2Impl : public IFaceImpl, IFace2
{
public:
using IFaceImpl::doit; // not resolving ambiguity
void doit2() override
{
}
};
int main()
{
IFace2Impl impl;
}
When I try to compile this code, the compiler gives me an error message:
<source>(36): error C2259: 'IFace2Impl': cannot instantiate abstract class
<source>(24): note: see declaration of 'IFace2Impl'
<source>(36): note: due to following members:
<source>(36): note: 'void IFace::doit(void)': is abstract
<source>(6): note: see declaration of 'IFace::doit'
https://godbolt.org/z/91M1j8bv3
For each virtual function I have to provide full definition:
class IFace2Impl : public IFaceImpl, IFace2
{
public:
void doit()
{
IFaceImpl::doit();
}
void doit2() override
{
}
};
Is there a way to handle this more elegantly? When number of interface method grows, the more ambiguities I have to resolve.
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire