First of all, I know this is not the best way to do this, I'm just looking how it should be done. I created a class called bord,which holds a member
std::unique_ptr<std::unique_ptr<char>[] > char_bord;
Which should be the correct syntax, then I try to initialize this in the constructor:
bord::bord():char_bord(new std::unique_ptr<char>[10])
{
//char_bord=new std::unique_ptr<char>[10]; //This did not seem to work aswell.
for(int i=0;i<10;i++)
char_bord[i]=new std::unique_ptr<char>[](new char[10]);
return;
}
This results in the following heap of errors, which I did not manage to decipher.
jelmer@jelmer-N56JN:~/Git/Board/lib$ g++ -std=c++0x bord.c
In file included from bord.c:1:0:
bord.h:20:1: error: new types may not be defined in a return type
class bord
^
bord.h:20:1: note: (perhaps a semicolon is missing after the definition of ‘bord’)
bord.c:3:12: error: return type specification for constructor invalid
bord::bord():char_bord(new std::unique_ptr<char>[10])
^
bord.c: In constructor ‘bord::bord()’:
bord.c:7:46: error: expected primary-expression before ‘]’ token
char_bord[i]=new std::unique_ptr<char>[](new char[10]);
^
bord.c:7:60: error: parenthesized initializer in array new [-fpermissive]
char_bord[i]=new std::unique_ptr<char>[](new char[10]);
^
bord.c:7:19: error: no match for ‘operator=’ (operand types are ‘std::unique_ptr<char>’ and ‘std::unique_ptr<char>*’)
char_bord[i]=new std::unique_ptr<char>[](new char[10]);
^
bord.c:7:19: note: candidates are:
In file included from /usr/include/c++/4.9/memory:81:0,
from bord.h:19,
from bord.c:1:
/usr/include/c++/4.9/bits/unique_ptr.h:249:7: note: std::unique_ptr<_Tp, _Dp>& std::unique_ptr<_Tp, _Dp>::operator=(std::unique_ptr<_Tp, _Dp>&&) [with _Tp = char; _Dp = std::default_delete<char>]
operator=(unique_ptr&& __u) noexcept
^
/usr/include/c++/4.9/bits/unique_ptr.h:249:7: note: no known conversion for argument 1 from ‘std::unique_ptr<char>*’ to ‘std::unique_ptr<char>&&’
/usr/include/c++/4.9/bits/unique_ptr.h:269:2: note: template<class _Up, class _Ep> typename std::enable_if<std::__and_<std::is_convertible<typename std::unique_ptr<_Up, _Ep>::pointer, typename std::unique_ptr<_Tp, _Dp>::_Pointer::type>, std::__not_<std::is_array<_Up> > >::value, std::unique_ptr<_Tp, _Dp>&>::type std::unique_ptr<_Tp, _Dp>::operator=(std::unique_ptr<_Up, _Ep>&&) [with _Up = _Up; _Ep = _Ep; _Tp = char; _Dp = std::default_delete<char>]
operator=(unique_ptr<_Up, _Ep>&& __u) noexcept
^
/usr/include/c++/4.9/bits/unique_ptr.h:269:2: note: template argument deduction/substitution failed:
bord.c:7:19: note: mismatched types ‘std::unique_ptr<_Tp, _Dp>’ and ‘std::unique_ptr<char>*’
char_bord[i]=new std::unique_ptr<char>[](new char[10]);
^
In file included from /usr/include/c++/4.9/memory:81:0,
from bord.h:19,
from bord.c:1:
/usr/include/c++/4.9/bits/unique_ptr.h:278:7: note: std::unique_ptr<_Tp, _Dp>& std::unique_ptr<_Tp, _Dp>::operator=(std::nullptr_t) [with _Tp = char; _Dp = std::default_delete<char>; std::nullptr_t = std::nullptr_t]
operator=(nullptr_t) noexcept
^
/usr/include/c++/4.9/bits/unique_ptr.h:278:7: note: no known conversion for argument 1 from ‘std::unique_ptr<char>*’ to ‘std::nullptr_t’
What am I doing wrong, assuming I am doing something wrong.
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire