This question already has an answer here:
I tried to implement a map operator based on the C++ operator ->*
. The purpose of this operator was to elegantly map/transform zero terminated char*
strings and wchar_t*
strings inplace.
template<typename T>
T* operator->*(T* iteratee, std::function<T(T)> mapFun) {
for(T* it = iteratee; *it; ++it)
*it = mapFun(*it);
return iteratee;
}
using namespace std;
int main()
{
char msg[] = "Hello World!";
cout << msg << endl;
cout << msg->*([](char c ) { return c+1; }) << endl;
}
Desired output is:
Hello World!
Ifmmp!Xpsme"
But instead I only get the following error:
21:15: error: no match for 'operator->*' (operand types are 'char*' and 'main()::<lambda(char)>')
21:15: note: candidate is:
10:4: note: template<class T> T* operator->*(T*, std::function<T(T)>)
10:4: note: template argument deduction/substitution failed:
21:46: note: 'main()::<lambda(char)>' is not derived from 'std::function<T(T)>'
Why is this happening?
I know, I can fix the Problem by either calling the operator explicitly, which makes the operator pretty inconvenient
cout << operator->*<char>(msg, [](char c ) { return c+1; }) << endl;
or by adding a second template argument to the operator:
template<typename T, typename F>
T* operator->*(T* iteratee, F mapFun) {
for(T* it = iteratee; *it; ++it)
*it = mapFun(*it);
return iteratee;
}
But this it not optimal, because the compiler doesn't complain, when I pass a function of the wrong type like the following usage, which compiles without warning:
cout << msg->*([](int i) { return 'a'+i; }) << endl;
So, how can I use the std::function
-version of the operator without explicitly mentioning the template arguments?
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire