Common keyword to 'continue' in sequential and parallel for loops

In a sequential for loop, the current iteration can be interrupted by calling continue. Similarly, in a Concurrency::parallel_for loop, the current iteration - which is a thread calling a lambda function - can be interrupted with return.

From time to time, it happens that I have to debug a parallel_for loop, make it sequential and forget to change the return into a continue, because in a void function, the compiler won't complain. This leads to errors that are really hard to track down sometimes.

I wonder if Visual C++ 2013 offers any mechanism to use the same keyword/macro/… for both loops. Is this possible?