Lambda in branch not taken of constant expression: Who is right?

I tried to compile the following C++11 code with mixed results.

struct NoTemplate {
    static constexpr auto (*foo)() = false ? +[]{} : nullptr;
};

NoTemplate no_inst;


template<typename>
struct YesTemplate {
    static constexpr auto (*foo)() = false ? +[]{} : nullptr;
};

YesTemplate<float> yes_inst;

• clang: Compiles NoTemplate sucessfully; gives error: a lambda expression may not appear inside of a constant expression on YesTemplate.
• gcc: Compiles both successfully
• msvc: Crashes.
• icc: Crashes (we have a winner!)

What is the correct result? I see some standard language suggesting non-constant expressions should be OK in the false branch of short-circuiting operators in constant expressions, but IANALL.