I hope the title makes sense. I probably miss vocabulary to express it correctly. Well, an exemple will probably be more clear.
Problem for me is: dynamic downcasting returns 0 at run time in some of the following cases (written in comments). I'd like to know if it's a correct behaviour (using C++11), also why, and what can I do to make it work. Apparently, Templated and A::A_templated are treated as different classes, despite being defined as identical by using alias "using". Problem doesn't appear for simple typedef alias.
template <class T>
class Templated {};
class A {
public :
typedef int A_Type;
template <class T>
using A_Templated = Templated<T>;
};
class Test_base {
public :
Test_base() {}
virtual void foo()=0;
};
template <class _Type>
class Test_Type : public Test_base {
public :
Test_Type() {}
void foo() {}
};
template < template <class T> class _Templated >
class Test_Templated : public Test_base {
public :
Test_Templated() {}
void foo() {}
};
int main() {
Test_base* test;
test = new Test_Type<int>;
std::cout << dynamic_cast< Test_Type<int>* >(test) << std::endl;//-->ok
std::cout << dynamic_cast< Test_Type<A::A_Type>* >(test) << std::endl;//-->ok
test = new Test_Templated<Templated>;
std::cout << dynamic_cast< Test_Templated<Templated>* >(test) << std::endl;//-->ok
std::cout << dynamic_cast< Test_Templated<A::A_Templated>* >(test) << std::endl;//--> returns 0 !
test = new Test_Templated<A::A_Templated>;
std::cout << dynamic_cast< Test_Templated<A::A_Templated>* >(test) << std::endl;//-->ok
std::cout << dynamic_cast< Test_Templated<Templated>* >(test) << std::endl;//--> returns 0 !
}
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire