I have a function that potentially moves a generic argument but through their members. What of these options is more correct:
-
This seems the more natural but it is strange because the argument is potentially moved twice, which is odd because the object can become invalid.
template<class T> void fun(T&& t){ myhead_ = std::forward<T>(t).head_; myrest_ = std::forward<T>(t).rest_; }
-
This can't be incorrect but it may not be moving anything.
template<class T> void fun(T&& t){ myhead_ = std::forward<decltype(t.head_)>(t.head_); myrest_ = std::forward<decltype(t.rest_)>(t.rest_); }
-
This seems correct but too much code.
template<class T> void fun(T& t){ myhead_ = t.head_; myrest_ = t.rest_; } template<class T> void fun(T&& t){ myhead_ = std::move(t.head_); myrest_ = std::move(t.rest_); }
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire