I don't know why when I run this piece of code :
#include <iostream>
#include <cstring>
class Masina{
private:
long long putere;
int viteza;
double masa;
bool calificativ;
char* nume;
public:
Masina();//constuctor default
Masina(long long putere,int viteza,double masa,bool calificativ,char* nume);//constructor supraincarcat
~Masina();//destructor
// Masina(const Masina&) = delete;
// setter-e
void setPutere(long long putere);
void setViteza(int viteza);
void setMasa(double masa);
void setCalificativ(bool calificativ);
void setNume(const char* nume);
// getter-e
long long getPutere() const;
int getViteza() const;
double getMasa() const;
bool getCalificativ() const;
char* getNume() const;
};
//definire metode:
//constructor default
Masina::Masina():
putere(2000), viteza(250), masa(1.5), calificativ(false),nume((char*)"o_marca")
{}
//constructor supraincarcat
Masina::Masina(long long putere,int viteza,double masa,bool calificativ,char* nume):
putere(putere), viteza(viteza),masa(masa),calificativ(calificativ)
{}
//destructor default
Masina::~Masina()
{
std::cout << "putere: "<<putere<<"\nviteza: "<<viteza<<"\nmasa: "<<masa<<"\ncalificativ: "<<calificativ<<"\nnume: "<<nume;
std::cout<<"\nobiectul a fost sters\n\n";
}
//setter-e
void Masina::setPutere(long long putere)
{
this->putere = putere;
}
void Masina::setViteza(int viteza)
{
this->viteza = viteza;
}
void Masina::setMasa(double masa)
{
this->masa = masa;
}
void Masina::setCalificativ(bool calificativ)
{
this->calificativ = calificativ;
}
void Masina::setNume(const char* nume)
{
strcpy(this->nume,(char*)nume);
}
//setter-e
long long Masina::getPutere() const
{
return putere;
}
int Masina::getViteza() const
{
return viteza;
}
double Masina::getMasa() const
{
return masa;
}
bool Masina::getCalificativ() const
{
return calificativ;
}
char* Masina::getNume() const
{
return nume;
}
int main(){
Masina* m1 = new Masina();
{
Masina m2 = *m1;
m2.setNume("o_barca");
}
delete m1;
return 0;
}
a segmentation fault occurs. As long as the copy constructor is not deleted I suppose that m2 should be a shallow copy of m1, thus, both char* nume
keep the same value (pointing to the very same memory location). Thus, I expect that a change of the string stored at the address pointed by char * nume
should change the content of both m1's and m2's string stored at char*nume
.
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire