Consider the following example:
#include <iostream>
#include <string>
#include <utility>
template <typename Base> struct Foo : public Base {
using Base::Base;
};
struct Bar {
Bar(const Bar&) { }
Bar(Bar&&) = delete;
};
int main() {
std::cout << std::is_move_constructible<Bar>::value << std::endl; // NO
std::cout << std::is_move_constructible<Foo<Bar>>::value << std::endl; // YES. Why?!
}
Why does compiler generates move constructor despite base class being non-move-constructible?
Is that in the standard or it's a compiler bug? Is it possible to "perfectly propagate" move construction from base to derived class?
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire