I have my main.cpp :
#include <boost/thread.hpp>
#include "../headers/BoostUDPSender.h"
#include "../headers/UDPListener.h"
#include "../headers/UDPPacket.h"
using namespace std;
int main(int argc, char** argv) {
cout << argv[1] << endl;
cout << argv[2] << endl;
BoostUDPSender boostUDPSend;
boostUDPSend.boostUDPPacket(argv[1], argv[2]);
}
and my BoostUDPSender.h
/*
* BoostUDPSender.h
*
* Created on: 19 Jan 2017
* Author: oisin
*/
#ifndef BOOSTUDPSENDER_H_
#define BOOSTUDPSENDER_H_
class BoostUDPSender {
public:
BoostUDPSender();
int boostUDPPacket(char* ipStr, char* port);
};
#endif /* BOOSTUDPSENDER_H_ */
and BoostUDPSender.cpp
#include "../headers/BoostUDPSender.h"
#include <string>
#include <iostream>
#include <boost/array.hpp>
#include <boost/asio.hpp>
#include <arpa/inet.h>
using boost::asio::ip::udp;
using namespace boost::asio::ip;
BoostUDPSender::BoostUDPSender() {
}
int boostUDPPacket(char* ipStr, char* port){
try
{
boost::asio::io_service io_service;
udp::resolver resolver(io_service);
udp::resolver::query query(udp::v4(), ipStr, port);
udp::endpoint receiver_endpoint = *resolver.resolve(query);
udp::socket socket(io_service);
socket.open(udp::v4());
boost::array<char, 1> send_buf = 0;
socket.send_to(boost::asio::buffer(send_buf), receiver_endpoint);
boost::array<char, 128> recv_buf;
udp::endpoint sender_endpoint;
size_t len = socket.receive_from(
boost::asio::buffer(recv_buf), sender_endpoint);
std::cout.write(recv_buf.data(), len);
}
catch (std::exception& e)
{
std::cerr << e.what() << std::endl;
}
return 0;
}
It all looks fine to me but when I compile with (Other files included below, not relevant to the above):
g++ UDPListener.cpp UDPPacket.cpp BoostUDPSender.cpp main.cpp -o main -lboost_thread -lboost_system -lpthread -std=c++11
I get:
/tmp/ccFPtASO.o: In function `main':
main.cpp:(.text+0x8f): undefined reference to `BoostUDPSender::boostUDPPacket(char*, char*)'
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
I don't understand how boostUDPPacket()
can be undefined, I'm creating my object and calling the method on it in the conventional way?
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire